Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Endangered Specious
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoL2x-ktry-AihUphZ2XATZYH22UEbliancZxVuiwxF6aGAVu4alQasfL4YbKpe7Tm0PZDAYdYZxbJImRfwztQGJxwBAV3zUNihkSSKWWdLirDVVsgTq4VV235xz6JKEbGBDyd/s320/Deer+in+Headlights.jpg)
Andrew at Evaluating Christianity is the stalwart soul and between him and a commenter there, Kurt Denke (particularly here and here), they've pretty well demolished the legal basis of this soon-to-be-short-lived suit.
By the way, anyone who wants an OCRed copy of the complaint can now get it at Steven Schafersman's site.
Hurry up! It's going to be a collector's item soon!
.
Comments:
<< Home
Forgive my fixation on form over function, but he says, "With that in mind, the first thing that strikes me about the complaint is the bizarre, blog-like use of bold, italics, underline, large and small caps, different fonts and different font sizes — all in the first two pages. No sensible litigator would file something that looks like this in federal court."
I wouldn't want to overstate it -- I've seen some pretty bad professional paperwork in my time and, of course, Federal judges get plenty of pro se filings that they nonetheless try to treat seriously -- but it's kind of like waiting for your doctor to treat your chest pains and having a guy in a clown suit show up.
Post a Comment
<< Home