Saturday, February 19, 2011

 

O'Reilly-isms



Thanks to Ed Brayton at Dispatches from the Culture Wars, we now know of an endless source of amusement ... endless because there is hardly anything that O'Reilly can't explain.
.


Link - Posted by John Pieret @ 12:24 PM
Comments:
...there is hardly anything that O'Reilly can't explain.

can?
# posted by Anonymous Thony C. : 3:32 PM
 
No, the sum total of things O'Reilly can't explain (and, therefore, assumes no one else can) is almost everything.
# posted by Blogger John Pieret : 5:31 PM
 
You've equated "hardly anything" and "almost everything" since you've equated both to what O'Reilly can't explain.

Or is equality not transitive over the set of what O'Reilly can't explain?
# posted by Anonymous Mike from Ottawa : 1:24 AM
 
Once you account for all of the things that O'Reilly can't explain, then there is hardly anything left. In other words, there is hardly anything left over from the set of all things that O'Reilly can't explain.
# posted by Anonymous 386sx : 2:45 AM
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

. . . . .

Organizations

Links
How to Support Science Education
archives