Friday, November 22, 2013
Stringing Us Along
It seems that Neanderthals made string ... ergo God!
Oh, let's see how this works. Humans (Neanderthals were close to, if not the same, species as us) appear to have taken a product of nature (plant fibers) and did something to them ... mechanically twisted them ... something that we can not only reproduce but can understand the reason for. It only "defies explanation by reference to unguided natural processes" if you assume that humans or our near relatives aren't also a result of unguided natural processes. In other words, if you run in such tight logical circles that there is a real danger of disappearing up your own ass.[Bruce] Hardy and his colleagues have found slender, 0.7-millimetre-long plant fibres that are twisted together near some stone artefacts at a site in south-east France that was occupied by Neanderthals 90,000 years ago. Such fibres are not twisted together in nature, says the team, suggesting that the Neanderthals were responsible (Quaternary Science Reviews, doi.org/pzx).Note the sentence in bold. Plant fibers twisted together are evidence of intelligent design, since such a pattern defies explanation by reference to unguided natural processes of chance and necessity. It reflects intention and creativity. But DNA strands twisted together and bearing the encoded genetic information vital to life -- oh sure, nature had no difficulty coming up with that one.
"If they are indeed remnants of string or cordage, then they would be the earliest direct evidence of string," says Hardy. "Albeit very fragmentary evidence."
At 90,000 years old, the material purported to be string predates the arrival of Homo sapiens in Europe.
On the other hand,
Yeah! How alike those propositions are!
The question that I have is whether saying "it is intelligently designed" is ever considered an adequate answer to a question about such-and-such.
My standard example is "Why is there a smile on the Mona Lisa?" We can all allow that the Mona Lisa was the product of Leonardo da Vinci. If anything counts as "intelligent design" then the Mona Lisa is intelligently designed.
Yet who would accept the answer to my question about the smile of the Mona Lisa: "There is a smile on the Mona Lisa because it is intelligently designed"?
I think there is a fallacy in such analogies. DNA has no similarity to cordage other than being longer than it is wide and being twisted.