Tuesday, February 05, 2013


To Tell the Truth ... Orly

You've heard the adage “When you're in a hole, stop digging.”

Orly Taitz hasn't.

When we last left the Taz, she had been ordered by Federal District Court Judge Andrew J. Guilford to show cause in writing why she should not be sanctioned for lying to the Court.

She had already pissed the judge off by, as he described it, acting “extremely unprofessionally in this Court of the United States of America by rolling her eyes and exhibiting gestures of contempt” when he wouldn't let her launch into yet another of her frequent tirades against all and sundry who are remotely involved in her delusions. Her opponent, and equally deranged birther, Philip Berg, has also exasperated the judge and he had previously order the parties, in preparation of his stated intention to end the madness in his court, to inform the Court immediately of any actions taken on pending ethical, disciplinary, or related matters concerning any of the parties now appearing in this case.

Orly told the judge that she didn't have any pending matters but Berg disagreed. When I last wrote about this, it wasn't clear whether Berg's allegation concerned the state court sanctions Orly got for abuse of process in her attempt to subpoena Occidental College's records on President Obama or something else. Now Orly has responded to the charge and, in fact, it is the Occidental case that is the crux of the matter.

Orly insists that the costs imposed are not sanctions but that, instead, “the award of $4,000 by Judge Marginis was for discovery, that it was indeed a cost shifting of attorneys fees related to discovery” under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1987.2. The only problem is that the relevant portion of Section 1987.2 reads:
[T]he court may in its discretion award the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in making or opposing the motion, including reasonable attorney's fees, if the court finds the motion was made or opposed in bad faith or without substantial justification or that one or more of the requirements of the subpoena was oppressive.
Frankly, the only way I can see Orly avoiding another major sanction is if Judge Guilford decides to show mercy on someone too stupid to understand the law. I'm not betting on it however.

0802jejeAfin asics gel noosa tri 9 vs kayano de minimiser l'érosion chimique, il ne peut nike air max 1 femme bleu pas être écrasé pendant nike air jordan xi 11 retro low citrus très longtemps et devra chaussure running asics femme avis laver la mousse immédiatement à air jordan chaussure site officiel l'eau froide. Cela a nike air max thea kaki pas cher pour effet de créer un new balance pas cher soldes mystère autour d'eux et air jordan future low basketball donc de maintenir la demande.

baskets tn nike Les producteurs de air jordan femme rouge Justified donnent ce style de Stetson à toutes leurs stars invitées. Les adidas zx flux noir blanc pas cher porte-bébés Pathfinder three.0 et Journey 2.0 Kelty sont également basket nike air max 2017 bleu équipés d'un système de stockage d'hydratation derrière le panneau asics gel lyte v bleu noir arrière, ainsi que d'une poche de bouteille d'eau facile air jordan 1 retro mid wb hare à trouver autour de la ceinture. Un des types baskets nike air presto de colle disponibles, Loctite GO2 Glue a atteint chaussures nike air pour femme la réputation dans chaque section du monde en raison de sa asics gel noosa tri 10 w femme performance.

We are proud to say that all our products buy clonazepam powder online are not displayed online without going through an intensive quality assurance process. buy ativan (lorazepam) online They are high-quality and unmatched in the industry. buy peruvian cocaine online, If you’re not happy, talk to us. buy volkswagen cocaine online Your happiness and satisfaction is our priority. buy crack cocaine online , buy cocaine powder online , buy mescaline online
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

. . . . .


How to Support Science Education